Yabbermouths

I’ve officially had my fill with intellectual arguments and discussions and debates. It’s no longer arguing WITH someone that’s important but how loud you can argue AT them. People are not interested in what their theoretical opponents think or feel but merely waiting till they can get their say in, their clever little blurb that’ll wrap up the whole discussion into a neat little package. It’s not the content of a conversation anymore, but it’s ending line.
The point of debate has become a moot point. When a liberal meets a conservative, there’s no attempt to reach an understanding, there’s not even any hope of one convincing the other. It just becomes a case of two yabbermouth monkeys throwing feces at each, masturbating their egos.
Then if either yabbermouth comes out on top, liberal or conservative (who are basically the same type of people when you think about it), we can always expect them to do nothing with their words. I’m an advocate of hypocrisy but only if you self admit it (Oddly enough if you acknowledge you that are a hypocrite it’s impossible to be a hypocrite).
Logic has failed humanity. Rhetoric is more important then reality. He said she said more important then results. People’s quant little reality tunnels, the mental beer goggles we see the world through, keep on shrinking while people don’t realize that they’re closing off their minds, segregating their thoughts from information they don’t agree with. We’re so convinced our ideological maps are the territory that any possibility for a person to change his mind, to realize that they were wrong and correct it, is as remote as the Green Party winning an election (though they should).
We only think with out heads and not our senses.
Quantum Mechanics has disproved propositional logic and how systems can even be related. Steven Hawking has shown how information can be destroyed, thus how cause and effect don’t even half to be related. If A = B and B = C, then C = a punch in the mouth.
Is logic empirical? Probably not.